The medical perspective on mining incidents

Author:

Karlsson Sofia,Saveman Britt-Inger,Gyllencreutz LinaORCID

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine emergency medical service (EMS) personnel’s perceptions and experiences of managing underground mining injury incidents. Design/methodology/approach In total, 13 EMS personnel were interviewed according to a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Findings An underground mining environment was described as unfamiliar and unsafe and, with no guidelines for operational actions in an extreme environment, such as underground mines, the EMS personnel were uncertain of their role. They therefore became passive and relied on the rescue service and mining company during a major incident. However, the medical care was not considered to be different from any other prehospital care, although a mining environment would make the situation more difficult and it would take longer for the mine workers to be placed under definitive care. Originality/value This study complements earlier studies by examining the EMS personnel’s perceptions and experiences of major incidents.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Safety Research

Reference27 articles.

1. The prehospital assessment of severe trauma patients performed by the specialist ambulance nurse in Sweden – a phenomenographic study;Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resucitation and Emergency Medicine,2012

2. Preparedness of Swedish EMS personnel for major incidents in underground mines;Journal of Health Science,2017

3. Mine rescue training facility inventory – compendium of ideas to improve US coal mine rescue training;Transactions of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration,2011

4. Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene?;Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal,2011

5. Burgers, J., Smolders, M., van der Weijden, T., Davis, D. and Grol, R. (2013), “Clinical practice guidelines as a tool for improving patient care”, in Grol, R., Wensing, M., Eccles, M. and Davis, D. (Eds), Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 91-113.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3