Author:
Gerpott Torsten J,May Sebastian
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to provide a foundation for firms trying to evaluate the suitability of Internet of Things (IoT)-enhanced offerings against the background of their current portfolio. Currently, quite a number of companies consider revising or extending their portfolio of products and services by incorporating IoT components to achieve competitive advantages. However, an unsystematic and autotelic addition of connected sensors and actuators to present offerings does not necessarily lead to substantial market success.
Design/methodology/approach
– The approach of this paper is to identify different roles which IoT components can play in offering portfolios; clarify business development objectives, which can be achieved by the combination of products and services with IoT components; and report case examples which help to highlight how business development objectives can be reached with the help of IoT components fulfilling specific roles.
Findings
– IoT components may play three different roles when integrated into product or service offerings. This role differentiation is crucial in understanding how IoT amendments can be instrumental in supporting the achievement of specific business development objectives pursued by a firm.
Research limitations/implications
– The framework is based on conceptual considerations. To overcome this limitation, empirical research on technology-, cost- and customer-related impacts of IoT-enhanced offerings is desirable.
Practical/implications
– Firms need to evaluate three roles which IoT components can play against the background of their present product portfolio when developing new business strategies.
Originality/value
– This paper combines literature on the principles of operation of IoT applications and business models with current use-cases to provide implications for IoT-related business development issues.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference42 articles.
1. Ashton, K.
(2009), “That ‘Internet of Things’ thing”, in RFID Journal, available at: www.rfidjournal.com/article/print/4986 (accessed 4 January 2016).
2. Balta-Ozkan, N.
,
Boteler, B.
and
Amerighi, O.
(2014), “European smart home market development: public views on technical and economic aspects across the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy”,
Energy Research and Social Science
, Vol. 3, pp. 65-77.
3. Basole, R.C.
and
Rouse, W.B.
(2008), “Complexity of service value networks: conceptualization and empirical investigation”,
IBM Systems Journal
, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 53-70.
4. Bohli, J.-M.
,
Sorge, C.
and
Westhoff, D.
(2009), “Initial observations on economics, pricing, and penetration of the internet of things market”,
Computer Communication Review
, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 50-55.
5. Bruhn, M.
,
Hepp, M.
and
Hadwich, K.
(2015), “Vom Produkthersteller zum Serviceanbieter – Geschäftsmodelle der Servicetransformation”,
Marketing Review St. Gallen
, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 28-38.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献