Usage and success factors of commercial recommendation agents

Author:

Aljukhadar Muhammad,Senecal Sylvain

Abstract

PurposeSince their inception, which took place more than two decades ago, product recommendation agents (RAs) still attract very few consumers. Notably, most of academic work in the field had an empirical quantitative structure. In addition, no research has developed a comprehensive model to explain the adoption and usage of commercial RAs. The purpose of this paper is to follow a qualitative approach to investigate the factors behind the adoption and usage of commercial RAs, explore the effect of user age, and deduce the success factors of these RAs.Design/methodology/approachThis research followed a qualitative approach. Qualitative research aims to form an in‐depth understanding of human behavior. It is essential for building grounded theory and for proposing comprehensive models for future examination. As such, in four discussion groups, participants provided their input following the shopping trial for a product using a factual RA (MyProductAdvisor.com). Discussion groups were used because they outline an important aspect of qualitative research and because they are ideal for both the inception and development of products and services.FindingsUnderlying the major themes, the analysis first provides insight in consumers' RA use and the products consumers regard as adequate to be offered using a commercial RA. The analysis then delineates some important factors that can be considered by developers to enhance the usability and trustworthiness of commercial RAs. Further, the analysis suggested four higher‐order factors that can be considered the success factors of a commercial RA: users appear to require a commercial RA that is friendly, smart, trusted, and informational. The themes that emerged from participants in the youth and the older discussion groups were rather invariant.Originality/valueThis is one of the few qualitative studies that focused on commercial RAs. The commercial RA success factors and their determinants are summarized in the form of a general framework to guide future work. This qualitative work provides a cornerstone that is of importance to theory development in the field of intelligent RAs and assistive technology. The results have important implications for RAs' developers and researchers.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference26 articles.

1. Aljukhadar, M., Senecal, S. and Daoust, C.‐E. (2010a), “Information overload and usage of recommendations”, paper presented at ACM RecSys 2010 Workshop on User‐Centric Evaluation of Recommender Systems and their Interfaces, Barcelona, 30 September.

2. Aljukhadar, M., Senecal, S. and Ouellette, D. (2010b), “Can the media richness of a privacy disclosure enhance outcome?A multifaceted view of trust in rich media environments”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 103‐26.

3. Ariely, D., Lynch, J. Jr and Aparicio, M. (2004), “Learning by collaborative and individual‐based recommendation agents”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2, pp. 81‐95.

4. Ballenstedt, B. (2010), “Tech generation gap widens”, available at: http:wiredworkplace.nextgov.com/2010/10/tech_generation_gap_widens.php (accessed 17 December 2010).

5. Bharati, P. and Chaudhury, A. (2004), “An empirical investigation of decision‐making satisfaction in web‐based decision support systems”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 187‐97.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3