Revisiting e‐learning effectiveness: proposing a conceptual model

Author:

Macgregor George,Turner James

Abstract

PurposeThe use of e‐learning is largely predicated upon the assumption that it can facilitate improvements in student learning and therefore can be more effective than conventional techniques. This assumption has been supported by some in the literature but has been questioned by a continuing body of contrary or indifferent evidence. The purpose of this paper is to improve the theoretical understanding of the variables influencing e‐learning effectiveness, the manner in which these variables have been studied to date, and to propose a suitable conceptual model of e‐learning effectiveness to aid its evaluation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper revisits and critically reviews major contributions to the e‐learning effectiveness literature.FindingsOwing to a variety of issues prevalent in the literature, it is clear that the variables influencing effectiveness are multifarious and few researchers impose adequate controls or factor them into research designs. Drawing on the work of Dewey, Englebart, and Kaplan, a conceptual framework of e‐learning effectiveness is proposed. This model maps out the key variables involved in the study of e‐learning effectiveness and the interactions between variables.Originality/valueIt is anticipated that such a model will assist researchers in developing future evaluative studies which are both sufficiently robust and holistic in design. It is also hypothesised that studies designed using the conceptual model will be more likely to yield results corroborating the ability of e‐learning to affect improvements in student learning.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education,Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference88 articles.

1. Abraham, T. (2002), “Evaluating the virtual management information systems (MIS) classroom”, Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 125‐34.

2. Abras, C., Ozok, A. and Preece, J. (2005), “Research methods for validating and deriving guidelines for e‐learning online communities”, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 207‐19.

3. Anakwe, B. (2008), “Comparison of student performance in paper‐based versus computer‐based testing”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 13‐17.

4. Anderson, T. (2004), “Toward a theory of online learning”, in Anderson, T. and Elloumi, F. (Eds), Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Athabasca University, Athabasca, pp. 33‐60.

5. Andretta, S. (2005), Information Literacy: A Practitioner's Guide, Chandos Publishing, Oxford.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3