Author:
Macgregor George,Turner James
Abstract
PurposeThe use of e‐learning is largely predicated upon the assumption that it can facilitate improvements in student learning and therefore can be more effective than conventional techniques. This assumption has been supported by some in the literature but has been questioned by a continuing body of contrary or indifferent evidence. The purpose of this paper is to improve the theoretical understanding of the variables influencing e‐learning effectiveness, the manner in which these variables have been studied to date, and to propose a suitable conceptual model of e‐learning effectiveness to aid its evaluation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper revisits and critically reviews major contributions to the e‐learning effectiveness literature.FindingsOwing to a variety of issues prevalent in the literature, it is clear that the variables influencing effectiveness are multifarious and few researchers impose adequate controls or factor them into research designs. Drawing on the work of Dewey, Englebart, and Kaplan, a conceptual framework of e‐learning effectiveness is proposed. This model maps out the key variables involved in the study of e‐learning effectiveness and the interactions between variables.Originality/valueIt is anticipated that such a model will assist researchers in developing future evaluative studies which are both sufficiently robust and holistic in design. It is also hypothesised that studies designed using the conceptual model will be more likely to yield results corroborating the ability of e‐learning to affect improvements in student learning.
Subject
Education,Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference88 articles.
1. Abraham, T. (2002), “Evaluating the virtual management information systems (MIS) classroom”, Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 125‐34.
2. Abras, C., Ozok, A. and Preece, J. (2005), “Research methods for validating and deriving guidelines for e‐learning online communities”, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 207‐19.
3. Anakwe, B. (2008), “Comparison of student performance in paper‐based versus computer‐based testing”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 13‐17.
4. Anderson, T. (2004), “Toward a theory of online learning”, in Anderson, T. and Elloumi, F. (Eds), Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Athabasca University, Athabasca, pp. 33‐60.
5. Andretta, S. (2005), Information Literacy: A Practitioner's Guide, Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献