Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the legal position and utility of preamble and also to determine what role has been played by Preambles in new trends in Bangladesh and Indian Constitutional Law.
Design/methodology/approach
The research methodology undertaken in this project is analytical method of research and comparative research.
Findings
In this paper, the first legal and academic dispute and a matter of arguments and discussions that whether preamble should be treated as a part of constitution is discussed. Also, this paper tries to examine the matter of interpretational value of preamble, i.e. role of preamble in interpretation of constitution vis-à-vis of statutes. Finally, this paper examines in particular the details of preambles of two countries that have played a prominent part in the development of Constitutionalism in India and Bangladesh.
Originality/value
This research work is based on both primary and secondary data. The main sources of this study include like textbooks, journal articles, some important daily newspapers, online documents and some publications. The study has also relied on decided cases of Apex Court of Bangladesh and the Subcontinent.
Reference59 articles.
1. A. G. v. Prince Ernest Augustus [1957] AC 436.
2. Anwar Hossain Chowdhury v. Bangladesh [1989] BLD Spl 1.
3. Atam Prakash v. State of Haryanna [1986] 2SCC: 249 AIR 1986 SC 859.
4. Balbir Kaur v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. [2000] 6 SCC 493.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献