A systematic integrative review of cognitive biases in consumer health information seeking: emerging perspective of behavioral information research

Author:

Chen Tsangyao

Abstract

PurposeWith the growing interest in behavioral health and medical decision-making, this systematic integrative review aims to understand research on cognitive biases in the context of consumer health information seeking and where future research opportunities may reside.Design/methodology/approachFollowing a systematic review protocol, 40 empirical research articles, out of 1,127 journal research papers from 12 academic databases, from 1995 to 2019, are included for review.FindingsThe study of cognitive biases in consumer health information seeking is a nascent and fast-growing phenomenon, with variety in publication venues and research methods. Among the 16 biases investigated, optimistic bias and confirmation bias have attracted most attention (46.9%). Researchers are most interested in specific disease/illness (35%) and the health factors of consumer products (17.5%). For theoretical presence, about one-third of the reviewed articles have cited behavioral economist Daniel Kahneman, although most of the references are the early works of Kahneman.Research limitations/implicationsAs an emerging research area, there exists plenty of cognitive biases to be investigated in the context of health information seeking. In the meantime, the adoption of more recent theoretical insights such as nudge for debiasing may enrich this research area. Health communication scientists may find incorporating the behavioral decision research framework enriches the disciplinary inquiry of health information seeking, while information scientists could use it to commence the cognitive turn of information science evolution.Originality/valueThrough evidence-based understanding, this review shows the potential research directions that health communication scientists and information scientists could contribute to optimize health decisions through the adoption of behavioral decision research framework.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference94 articles.

1. Consumers’ optimism bias and responses to risk disclosures in direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising: the moderating role of subjective health literacy;Journal of Consumer Affairs,2014

2. The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2014

3. Exploratory research focusing on oral cancer prevention: challenges of dealing with informational and cognitive barriers;Qualitative Health Research,2018

4. The effect of information quality evaluation on selective exposure in informational cognitive dissonance: the role of information novelty;International Review of Social Psychology,2018

5. Information processing and negative affect: evidence from the 2003 health information national trends survey;Health Psychology,2008

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Users’ experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory study;BMC Public Health;2024-01-03

2. Behavioural economics theories in information-seeking behaviour research: A systematic review;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2023-12-31

3. From Rational Agent to Human with Bounded Rationality;A Behavioral Economics Approach to Interactive Information Retrieval;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3