Stories from my PhD journey: rewriting my methodology chapter

Author:

Goward Penelope

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to describe a case study of how an unexpected event created an opportunity to reconsider and rewrite the methodology chapter in the author’s PhD thesis. Design/methodology/approach – The approach that the author used that assisted her to change her methodology involved a combination of reflective and reflexive reading, thinking and writing. It was a slow and thorough process through which the author considered widely the choices that she was making. Through an iterative process of writing, reading and talking, and then re-writing, the author was able to establish a position or standpoint from which she felt confident about the underpinnings of her study. Findings – The author came to understand herself ontologically in a new way. The author could see how she had moved significantly from a positivist view of static bodies of knowledge creation to a paradigm involving a more dynamic knowledge creation. Correspondingly, the author was able to revise and focus her methodology, and in the course of the process, she learnt and grew as a person and as a researcher. The author understood her values, assumptions and beliefs about the world much more clearly. The author also became much more aware of her own PhD journey, how she was developing personally and how her identity was evolving. Originality/value – This paper will be useful for those who are embarking on their PhD journey and attempting to critique and/or rethink their methodological approach in the qualitative or interpretivist paradigm.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference44 articles.

1. Akbari, R. (2007), “Reflections on reflection: a critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education”, System , Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 192-207.

2. Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2009), Reflexive Methodology , SAGE, Los Angeles, CA.

3. Andrews, M. , Squire, C. and Tamboukou, M. (Eds) (2008), Doing Narrative Research , Sage, Los Angeles, CA.

4. Angrosino, M. (2007), Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research , SAGE, Los Angeles, CA.

5. Charmaz, K. (2000), “Grounded theory”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 509-535.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3