Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss a social constructionist point of view about mental health in contrast to the medical model.
Design/methodology/approach
This is a discussion paper bringing together two systems of thought concerning mental health and its origins.
Findings
It is not clear that there is any substantive evidence to support the medical model of mental illness.
Research limitations/implications
Researchers may be helped to consider a qualitative approach to knowledge rather than the traditional positivist approach.
Practical implications
This paper will help people to think about mental health in a way that is not orthodox.
Social implications
It will bring an understanding that even though mental illness is not an illness in the traditional sense, there is still no blame or shame associated with it.
Originality/value
The author is an active operational senior manager at a user-led community mental health organisation with over 20 years’ experience in the field. The organisation and its services track a social constructionist philosophy.
Subject
Health (social science),Pshychiatric Mental Health,Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference49 articles.
1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
2. Medicine and faith in early Christianity;Bulletin of the History of Medicine,1982
3. Human systems as linguistic systems: preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory;Family Process,1988
4. Lived experience leading the way – peer support in mental health,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献