Eliciting requirements for an inter‐company cooperative information system

Author:

Bendjenna Hakim,Zarour Nacer‐eddine,Charrel Pierre‐Jean

Abstract

PurposeThe requirements engineering (RE) process constitutes the earliest phase of the information system development life cycle. Requirements elicitation is considered as one of the most critical activities of this phase. Moreover, requirements elicitation is still a challenge, especially in the distributed environment of so‐called inter‐company cooperative information systems (ICISs). The purpose of this paper is to propose a methodology to elicit requirements for an ICIS.Design/methodology/approachAn analytical research approach was conducted. The current RE approaches, which are based either on goal, scenario or viewpoint were evaluated. Then the role of the elicitation technique selection step within the requirements elicitation process was examined. Finally the factors that affect this step in a distributed environment were studied. An example from the textile industry is used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed methodology.FindingsThough existing requirements elicitation approaches based either on goal, scenario or viewpoint are effective techniques, they do not fit exactly to a cooperative distributed environment: more issues are created by inadequate communication, time difference between sites, cultural, language and characteristics diversity of stakeholders which affect the elicitation technique selection step and thus the requirements elicitation process. In order to tackle these issues, this paper presents a methodology called MAMIE (from Macro‐ to Micro‐level requirements Elicitation) to elicit requirements for an ICIS. A prototype tool has been developed to support the operation of the methodology.Research limitations/implicationsThe major limitation of the paper is that has not yet been tested in an existing organization.Practical implicationsTo provide the analyst with well‐defined steps in order to elicit requirements of an ICIS. To understand the role of the elicitation technique selection step within the requirements elicitation process and identifying the factors which have an impact on this step. To select an appropriate elicitation technique according to these factors.Originality/valueMAMIE integrates the three notions of goal, scenario and viewpoint to elicit requirements for an ICIS. The paper argues that these concepts may be used simultaneously and in a complementary way to improve the requirements elicitation process. Moreover, in order to increase the quality of the elicited requirements and thus the quality of the system‐to‐be, selecting an elicitation technique in MAMIE is not based on personal preferences but on situation assessment.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Computer Science,Information Systems

Reference57 articles.

1. Alencar, F., Silva, C., Lucena, M., Castro, J.F.B., Santos, E. and Ramos, R.A. (2008), “Improving the understandability of i* models”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Barcelona, pp. 129‐36.

2. Antón, A.I., Dempster John, H. and Devon, F.S. (2000), “Managing use cases during goal‐driven requirements engineering: challenges encountered and lessons learned”, North Carolina State University Technical Report No. TR‐99‐16, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, December 1.

3. Aranda, G., Vizcaíno, A., Cechich, A. and Piattini, M. (2005a), “A cognitive‐based approach to improve distributed requirement elicitation processes”, Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI 2005), Irvine.

4. Aranda, G., Vizcaíno, A., Cechich, A. and Piattini, M. (2005b), “A cognitive perspective for choosing groupware tools and elicitation techniques in virtual teams”, Proceedings of the ICCSA Conference, LNCS Springer, Vol. 3480, pp. 1064‐74.

5. Aranda, G., Vizcaíno, A., Cechich, A. and Piattini, M. (2008), “Strategies to minimize problems in global requirements elicitation”, CLEI Electronic Journal, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 117‐27.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Conceptual Model e-Collaboration for Rural Tourism – Combining Soft System Methodology and UML;Procedia Computer Science;2024

2. Eliciting user requirements for e-collaboration systems: a proposal for a multi-perspective modeling approach;Requirements Engineering;2017-12-21

3. An UML Profile to Design Aspects in AspeCiS Approach;2012 Second International Workshop on Advanced Information Systems for Enterprises;2012-11

4. Using multi‐criteria analysis to prioritize stakeholders;Journal of Systems and Information Technology;2012-08-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3