Abstract
PurposeThis paper seeks to draw attention to the importance of appreciating and using ever‐present diversity to achieve increased legitimacy for entrepreneurship education. As such, it aims to draw the reader into a reflective process of discovery as to why entrepreneurship education is important and how such importance can be prolonged.Design/methodology/approachThe paper revisits Gartner's 1985 conceptual framework for understanding the complexity of entrepreneurship. The paper proposes an alternative framework based on the logic of Gartner's framework to advance the understanding of entrepreneurship education. The authors discuss the dimensions of the proposed framework and explain the nature of the dialogic relations contained within.FindingsIt is argued that the proposed conceptual framework provides a new way to understand ever‐present heterogeneity related to the development and delivery of entrepreneurship education.Practical implicationsThe paper extends an invitation to the reader to audit their own involvement and proximity to entrepreneurship education. It argues that increased awareness of the value that heterogeneity plays in student learning outcomes and programme branding is directly related to the presence of heterogeneity across the dimensions of the conceptual framework.Originality/valueThe paper introduces a simple yet powerful means of understanding what factors contribute to the success or otherwise of developing and delivering entrepreneurship education. The simplicity of the approach suggested provides all entrepreneurship educators with the means to audit all facets of their programme.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies
Reference23 articles.
1. Aldrich, H.E. (1999), Organizations Evolving, Sage Publications, London.
2. Aldrich, H.E. and Martinez, M.A. (2001), “Many are called, but few are chosen: an evolutionary perspective for the study of entreprenuership”, Entrepreneurship, Theory ad Practice, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 41‐57.
3. Beard, C. (2008), “Experiential research: forging new identities for experience”, Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Experiential Learning, University of Technology of Sydney, Sydney, December 8‐12, 2008.
4. Bruyat, C. and Julien, P.A. (2001), “Defining the field of entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 165‐80.
5. De Faoite, D., Henry, C., Johnston, K. and Van der Sijde, P. (2003), “Education and training for entrepreneurs: a consideration of initiatives in Ireland and The Netherlands”, Education + Training, Vol. 45 No. 8, pp. 430‐8.
Cited by
112 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献