The relevance of credit ratings over the business cycle
-
Published:2016-03-21
Issue:2
Volume:17
Page:152-168
-
ISSN:1526-5943
-
Container-title:The Journal of Risk Finance
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JRF
Author:
Fieberg Christian,Mertens Richard Lennart,Poddig Thorsten
Abstract
Purpose
Credit market models and the microstructure theory of the ratings market suggest that information provided by credit rating agencies becomes more relevant in recessions when agency costs are high and less relevant in expansions when agency costs are low. The purpose of this paper is to empirically test these hypotheses with regard to equity markets.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors use business cycle identification algorithms to map rating events (credit rating changes and watchlist inclusions) to business cycle phases and apply the event study methodology. The results are backed by cross-sectional regressions using a variety of control variables.
Findings
The authors find that the relevance of information provided by credit rating agencies for equity prices heavily depends on the level of agency costs. Furthermore, the authors detect a “flight-to-quality” during recessions in the speculative grade segment and a weakened relevance of rating events in expansions in the investment grade segment.
Originality/value
This paper is the first to empirically analyse how equity investors perceive credit rating changes and watchlist inclusions over the business cycle. In the empirical analysis, the authors use a large sample of about 25,000 rating events in all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development markets. The presented results underline that credit ratings address the agency problem in financial markets and can thus be regarded as useful for risk management or regulation.
Reference42 articles.
1. Ashcraft, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and Vickery, J. (2010), “MBS ratings and the mortgage credit boom”, Discussion Paper, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research 2010-89S, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research, available at: http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/kubcen/201089s.html 2. Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G. and Philipov, A. (2007), “Momentum and credit rating”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 62 No. 5, pp. 2503-2520, available at: www.jstor.org/stable/4622342 3. Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G. and Philipov, A. (2009), “Credit ratings and the cross-section of stock returns”, Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 469-499, available at: http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finmar/v12y2009i3p469-499.html 4. Baker, M.P. and Wurgler, J.A. (2009), “Government bonds and the cross-section of stock returns”, SSRN Journal, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1363905 5. Bannier, C.E., Behr, P. and Guttler, A. (2009), “Rating opaque borrowers: why are unsolicited ratings lower?”, Review of Finance, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 263-294, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfp025
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|