Author:
Ackermann Malte Stefan,Stephan Michael,Penrose John M.
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is twofold: to quantify the communication of organizational innovativeness (OI) on a large scale; and to examine the relationship of communicating OI and the corresponding investments in research and development (R
&
D) of multinational corporations (MNCs).
Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 3,043 annual reports from 326 MNCs are examined utilizing quantitative content analysis, which focusses on fixed selected terminologies, in the years 1998-2008.
Findings
– Scholars assume that the capacity for OI is becoming the single most important task in organizational survival. Even though in the sample the investments in R
&
D are not increasing, even slightly declining, the communication of OI is increasing. Using mixed-effects regression analysis, the findings indicate that the corporations that are investing in R
&
D are also communicating these efforts correspondingly.
Practical implications
– This is the first study that measures the communication of OI using quantitative content analysis.
Originality/value
– The results indicate that not only do the communication efforts of an organization’s OI have a perceived increasing importance. They also suggest that OI itself has become more important for organizations from a strategic point of view.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference112 articles.
1. Abraham, B.P.
and
Moitra, S.D.
(2001), “Innovation assessment through patent analysis”,
Technovation
, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 245-252.
2. Abratt, R.
and
Lombard, A.
(1993), “Determinants of product innovation in specialty chemical companies”,
Industrial Marketing Management
, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 169-176.
3. Ackermann, M.
(2013), “The evolution of innovation: a lexical perspective”,
Innovation Journalism
, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
4. Acs, Z.J.
,
Anselin, L.
and
Varga, A.
(2002), “Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge”,
Research Policy
, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 1069-1085.
5. Anderson, N.
,
De Dreu, C.K.W.
and
Nijstad, B.A.
(2004), “The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science”,
Journal of Organizational Behavior
, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 147-173.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献