Abstract
Companies pursuing certification to quality standards must apply change methodologies to institutionalize the requirements into the business. Existing change models, such as Burke‐Litwin, can serve as the foundation for identifying underlying, predictive variables impacting response variables of a quality management system including quality and delivery performance. The models were selected based on their applicability and similarity in integration of organizational variables with great similarities to those of a typical quality management system. Adaptation of change models specifically to quality management standards provides the conceptual framework in which businesses can operate. The discussion reviews quality management standards, organizational change and models, and change management in pursuit of certification. A conceptual model was developed and serves as the foundation for empirical research efforts. This bridges the gap between organizational change models and quality management systems.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference64 articles.
1. Ahire, S.L., Golhar, D.Y. and Waller, M.A. (1996), “Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 44‐50.
2. Benson, P.G., Saraph, J.V. and Schroeder, R.G. (1991), “The effects of organizational context on quality management: an empirical investigation”, Management Science, Vol. 37 No. 9, pp. 1107‐24.
3. Bergstrom, R.Y. (1996), “Looking for a break in the quality drive? Don't”, Automotive Production, Vol. 108 No. 6, pp. 26‐31.
4. Black, S.A. and Porter, L.J. (1996), “Identification of the critical factors of TQM”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1‐21.
5. Blumenthal, B. and Haspeslagh, P. (1994), “Toward a definition of corporate transformation”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 101‐6.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献