Author:
Meng Tay Kai,Peng Lim Chee
Abstract
PurposeTo propose a generic method to simplify the fuzzy logic‐based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) methodology by reducing the number of rules that needs to be provided by FMEA users for the fuzzy risk priority number (RPN) modeling process.Design/methodology/approachThe fuzzy RPN approach typically requires a large number of rules, and it is a tedious task to obtain a full set of rules. The larger the number of rules provided by the users, the better the prediction accuracy of the fuzzy RPN model. As the number of rules required increases, ease of use of the model decreases since the users have to provide a lot of information/rules for the modeling process. A guided rules reduction system (GRRS) is thus proposed to regulate the number of rules required during the fuzzy RPN modeling process. The effectiveness of the proposed GRRS is investigated using three real‐world case studies in a semiconductor manufacturing process.FindingsIn this paper, we argued that not all the rules are actually required in the fuzzy RPN model. Eliminating some of the rules does not necessarily lead to a significant change in the model output. However, some of the rules are vitally important and cannot be ignored. The proposed GRRS is able to provide guidelines to the users which rules are required and which can be eliminated. By employing the GRRS, the users do not need to provide all the rules, but only the important ones when constructing the fuzzy RPN model. The results obtained from the case studies demonstrate that the proposed GRRS is able to reduce the number of rules required and, at the same time, to maintain the ability of the Fuzzy RPN model to produce predictions that are in agreement with experts' knowledge in risk evaluation, ranking, and prioritization tasks.Research limitations/implicationsThe proposed GRRS is limited to FMEA systems that utilize the fuzzy RPN model.Practical implicationsThe proposed GRRS is able to simplify the fuzzy logic‐based FMEA methodology and make it possible to be implemented in real environments.Originality/valueThe value of the current paper is on the proposal of a GRRS for rule reduction to enhance the practical use of the fuzzy RPN model in real environments.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference25 articles.
1. Bell, D., Cox, L., Jackson, S. and Schaefer, P. (1992), “Using causal reasoning for automated failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)”, Proceedings of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 343‐53.
2. Ben‐Daya, M. and Raouf, A. (1993), “A revised failure mode and effects analysis model”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 43‐7.
3. Bowles, J.B. and Peláez, C.E. (1995), “Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 2 No. 50, pp. 203‐13.
4. Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation (1995), Potential Failure Mode and Effect analysis (FMEA) Reference Manual.
5. Guimarães, A.C.F. and Lapa, C.F. (2004), “Effects analysis fuzzy inference system in nuclear problems using approximate reasoning”, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 31, pp. 107‐15.
Cited by
176 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献