Quality for the individual and for the company in the business‐to‐business market

Author:

Ojasalo Jukka

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this article is to increase knowledge of the nature of quality in the business‐to‐business market by focusing on the individual and company level aspects of quality. This is relevant because the distinction between individual and company levels in the context of quality has received very little attention in the literature. Also, there is little knowledge of the processes that can lead to quality trade‐off situations between organizational and individual goals.Design/methodology/approachThis article is based on empirical qualitative study on quality in business‐to‐business professional services.FindingsThis article introduces the concepts of quality for the individual and for the company in the business‐to‐business market. It also contributes by explaining and analyzing processes increasing the likelihood of trade‐off between quality for the individual and quality for the company.Research limitations/implicationsThe present study is characterized by the general limitations: lack of statistical reliability and validity; can be used to generate hypotheses but not to test them; and generalizations cannot be made. The following avenues for further research can be suggested. The role of rational and emotional elements should be examined in more detail. The overtime development of quality for the individual and for the company during a long‐term relationship would be an interesting topic for an in‐depth research. Dimensions of quality for the individual and for the company and their priorities may vary in different cultures; a cross‐cultural survey would be required to shed light on this issue.Practical implicationsThe managerial implications of the present study are also discussed including several practical examples of aspects and challenges related to quality for the individual and for the company.Originality/valueThe findings and concepts introduced in this article contribute to the literature because the distinction between individual and company levels in the context of quality has received very little attention in the earlier research. Also, there is little empirical knowledge of the processes that can lead to quality trade‐off situations between organizational and individual goals.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Magic Ring in Action Explores Quality and Productivity;The Magic Ring;2021

2. What does “green quality” really mean?;The TQM Journal;2019-01-14

3. The effect of inventory performance on product quality;International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management;2018-11-29

4. Student Feedback Process in Enhancement of Quality of Higher Education;Handbook of Research on Higher Education in the MENA Region;2014

5. Suggesting and Comparing Different Scopes on Quality Management: Production, Service, Relationship, and Network;Total Quality Management & Business Excellence;2007-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3