Author:
Ahmed Shamsuddin,Hassan Masjuki
Abstract
Quality management (QM) cannot be assured unless some objective assessments are undertaken. A number of tools and techniques are available to conduct such analysis. Although some of them are product or service specific, however, a few basic tools and techniques are commonly used in manufacturing firms. This study focuses on the state of application of QM tools and techniques in small and medium industries (SMIs). The findings reveal that by‐and‐large, lack of methodical analysis is a major weakness of SMIs. Still some rule‐of‐thumb and subjective observations are dominating over objective evaluation in the process of quality control decisions. A few case studies which have been conducted, and one that has been briefly reported here, also support this conclusion. The methodology of the study has three folds: literature review, survey in SMIs and case studies.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference57 articles.
1. Anderson, M. and Sohal, A.S. (1999), “A study of the relationship between quality management practices and performance in small businesses”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 16 No. 9, pp. 859‐77.
2. Antony, J., Kaya, M. and Frangou, A. (1998), “A strategic methodology to the use of advanced statistical quality improvement techniques”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 169‐76.
3. Asher, J.M. (1992), Implementing TQM in Small‐and‐Medium‐sized Companies, Technical Communication, Letchworth.
4. Balnaves, M. and Cupit, P. (2001), Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods: An Investigative Approach, Sage Publishers, London.
5. Barrier, M. (1992), Small firms put quality first, Nation's Business, pp. 22‐32.
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献