Legitimising quality principles through critical incidents in organisational development

Author:

McAdam Rodney,Hazlett Shirley‐Ann,Henderson Joan

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to analyse how critical incidents or organisational crises can be used to check and legitimise quality management change efforts in relation to the fundamental principles of quality.Design/methodology/approachMultiple case studies analyse critical incidents that demonstrate the importance of legitimisation, normative evaluation and conflict constructs in this process. A theoretical framework composed of these constructs is used to guide the analysis.FindingsThe cases show that the critical incidents leading to the legitimisation of continuous improvement (CI) were diverse. However all resulted in the need for significant ongoing cost reduction to achieve or retain competitiveness. In addition, attempts at legitimising CI were coupled with attempts at destabilising the existing normative practice. This destabilisation process, in some cases, advocated supplementing the existing approaches and in others replacing them. In all cases, significant conflict arose in these legitimising and normative evaluation processes.Research limitations/implicationsIt is suggested that further research could involve a critical analysis of existing quality models, tools and techniques in relation to how they incorporate, and are built upon, fundamental quality management principles. Furthermore, such studies could probe the dangers of quality curriculum becoming divorced from business and market reality and thus creating a parallel existence.Practical implicationsAs demonstrated by the case studies, models, tools and techniques are not valued for their intrinsic value but rather for what they will contribute to addressing the business needs. Thus, in addition to being an opportunity for quality management, critical incidents present a challenge to the field. Quality management must be shown to make a contribution in these circumstances.Originality/valueThis paper is of value to both academics and practitioners.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference50 articles.

1. Abrahamson, E. and Fairchild, G. (2001), “Management fashion: lifecycles, triggers and collective learning processes”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 708‐40.

2. Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2002), Doing Critical Management Research, Sage, London.

3. Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (1996), Making Sense of Management, Sage, London.

4. Amabile, T., Hadley, C. and Kramer, J. (2002), “Creativity under the gun”, Harvard Business Review, August, pp. 52‐61.

5. Barley, S. and Kunda, G. (1992), “Design and devotion: surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 363‐400.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3