Operationalizing cultural political economy: towards critical grounded theory

Author:

Belfrage Claes Axel,Hauf Felix

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to take conceptual and methodological steps towards the elaboration of the critical grounded theory (CGT) method. Design/methodology/approach – Starting from conceptual issues with mapping everyday discourses and practices in their broader societal context in organisational ethnography, cultural political economy (CPE) is proposed as a suitable theoretical framework for integrating the cultural dimension of discourses and imaginaries into political-economic analyses of organisation and management. The CGT method is introduced for empirical operationalisation. Findings – Grounded theory tools for working with ethnographic data can be employed within critical approaches such as CPE although they originate from positivist social science. The need to combine ethnographic fieldwork with substantial theoretical work and/or critical discourse analysis may be met by CGT, which affords the ethnographic strengths of grounded theory without, however, bracketing the critical-theoretical insights of CPE. Research limitations/implications – The usefulness of CGT has been tentatively tested, but requires thorough meta-theoretical and methodological development, which is what is undertaken here. Social implications – CGT expects and takes account of the social implications of its employment in the field. Originality/value – First steps towards a new critical method for organisation and management studies are taken. Although originating from concern with CPE, the CGT method may appeal to a wider audience of critical scholars across the social sciences.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference54 articles.

1. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (Eds) (2004), Cultural Economy Reader , Blackwell, Oxford.

2. Belfrage, C. and Hauf, F. (2013), “The gentle art of retroduction: critical grounded theory as a method for (cultural) political economy research”, paper presented at the 11th European Sociological Association Annual Conference, Turin, 28-31 August.

3. Best, J. and Paterson, M. (Eds) (2010), Cultural Political Economy , Routledge, London and New York, NY.

4. Bhaskar, R. (1986), Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation , Verso, London.

5. Blau, P.M. and Scott, W.R. (1963), Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach , Routledge & Kegan, London.

Cited by 87 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Making Techno-Economic Rationality Work: Tensions in Technology-Enabled Social Service Evaluations;Journal of Technology in Human Services;2023-11-29

2. Inhalt;Kultur und soziale Praxis;2023-11-02

3. Frontmatter;Kultur und soziale Praxis;2023-11-02

4. Editorial;Kultur und soziale Praxis;2023-11-02

5. Sonstige Dokumente;Kultur und soziale Praxis;2023-11-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3