Author:
Gilbert Michael,Wakefield Alison
Abstract
Purpose
Fraud has a significant effect on society. It has been estimated to cost the UK economy more than £50bn annually. The Government have signalled their determination to tackle these losses through a range of preventative, enforcement and collaborative activities. Diminishing police resources allocated to fraud means that this activity will need to be delivered by both law enforcement and civilian counter fraud teams. This paper aims to establish whether UK central government organisations have the legal powers, skills and regulation needed to tackle fraud effectively.
Design/methodology/approach
This research was based upon a literature review, which included academic and other material, a semi-structured interview programme and a survey of counter fraud champions.
Findings
Empirical data suggested that the effectiveness of central government civilian counter fraud teams is hampered by a fragmented legal landscape and a lack of skills, and that further professionalisation and regulation is needed to protect professional standards and individual legal rights.
Research limitations/implications
Postal survey had 50 per cent response rate – below gold standard of 70 per cent.
Practical implications
There are no practical implications, as this is a topical research area which is intended to inform counter fraud practice and development.
Social implications
This research highlights limitations on the UK central government’s ability to tackle fraud. There is therefore a low risk that, when published, this research could inform those considering fraudulent actions.
Originality/value
This research was undertaken for a professional doctorate and has been sent to the Cabinet Office to inform their professionalisation programme. It filled a potential gap in the academic literature by looking at the perceived powers, skills and regulatory pressures in place within the UK central government and the extent of the current gap between current practice and the delivery of a fully professionalised service.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference36 articles.
1. Organisational strategy, external regulation and public service performance;Public Administration,2008
2. Australian Government (2007), Best Practice Regulation Handbook, Canberra, available at: http://regulationbodyofknowledge.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/AustralianGovernment_Best_Practice_Regulation.pdf
3. Baker, S. (2011), “Redacted”, available at: www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2011-03-21b.825.0
4. The fraud review and the policing of fraud: laying the foundations for a centralised fraud police or counter fraud executive;Policing,2008
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献