Legal questions on financial market abuse

Author:

Pera Alessandra

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to underline the impact that globalization of financial markets has on national punishment policies. The US financial crisis has strongly affected consumers’ lives, but the focus of this research is on the national provisions against the illegal and unfair behaviour of economic actors, with special regard to a phenomenon that took place abroad, but whose effects came to light in many different countries. Design/methodology/approach – Different methodological approaches, both deductive and inductive, are combined in the present paper, together with comparative and philosophical insights on national Court decisions and scholar writings. Findings – As European Union (EU) member States experts are discussing about a lex mercatoria for the financial markets to govern the EU integration process, this study highlights some questions concerning mainly three aspects: the level of censorship; forms and nature of responsibility; punitive models and their micro- and macro-economic effects. Originality/value – The study offers insights into the possible answers in terms of criminal and private law remedies to fight financial market abuse in a global dimension, through the use of general principles of contractual and tort law, which are common among EU member State, as culpa in eligendo, culpa in vigilando, duty of information, duty of care, ecc […] .

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference28 articles.

1. Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. et al., No. 07-690n (M.D. Fla. 4/23/07), available at: www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/Binderl.pdf

2. de Vries Robbé, J.J. (2008), Securitization Law and Practice: In the Face of the Credit Crunch , Austin, TX.

3. Kant, I. (2003), Per una pace perpetua , Milano.

4. Keynes, J.M. (1982), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes , Vol. 21, Macmillan, Cambridge University Press, London.

5. Kormos, B.J. (2008), “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Revisiting rating agency regulation”, International Business Law Journal , Vol. 4, p. 569.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3