Author:
Esra Karadeniz E.,Göçer Kenan
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors that underlie the internationalization of small‐ medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) and to identify the most significant factors/variables that are related to the internationalization process of these firms in Turkey.Design/methodology/approachThe data for the analysis conducted in this study were collected from 471 owners/managers of SMEs in Turkey. This study examined the relationship of all variables in the internationalization of the small firms through use of Pearson and regression analysis.FindingsThis study showed that the ability to be an exporter was related to the business age and size, the intensity of R&D, the growth rate of the domestic markets and the planning for export, pursued by SMEs.Research limitations/implicationsThe cross‐sectional nature of this study may have limitations in regards to observing the direction and causality of some of the variables. The caution should be also taken when generalizing the findings beyond the scope of this study. The findings are limited to Turkish SMEs.Originality/valueA model in this study combines three classes of variables – firm, environmental, and management. Most empirical research has been concentrated on investigating one of these variables in relation to international performance. Earlier empirical research also concentrates on established larger firms and has not taken small firms into account. This study fills in a gap in the empirical research in terms of combining these variables to explain the internationalization process and studying the effect of these variables on smaller firms.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference44 articles.
1. Aaby, N.E. and Slater, S.E. (1989), “Management influence on export performance: a review of the empirical literature”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 7‐26.
2. Abdel‐Malek, T. (1978), “Export marketing orientation in small firms”, American Journal of Small Business, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 25‐34.
3. Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977), “Estimating non‐response bias in mail surveys”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, pp. 396‐402.
4. Aspelund, A. and Moen, Ø. (2005), “Small international firms: typology, performance and implications”, Management International Review, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 37‐50.
5. Bartee, R.T., Grandjean, B.D. and Bieber, S.L. (2004), “Confirming the reliability of a theory‐based questionnaire”, American Journal of Health Studies, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 175‐80.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献