How do chocolate lovers balance taste and ethical considerations?

Author:

Poelmans Eline,Rousseau Sandra

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how chocolate lovers balance taste and ethical considerations when selecting chocolate products. Design/methodology/approach – The data set was collected through a survey at the 2014 “Salon du Chocolat” in Brussels, Belgium. The authors distributed 700 copies and received 456 complete responses (65 percent response rate). Choice experiments were used to estimate the relative importance of different chocolate characteristics and to predict respondents’ willingness to pay for marginal changes in those characteristics. The authors estimate both a conditional logit model and a latent class model to take possible preference heterogeneity into account. Findings – On average, respondents were willing to pay 11 euros more for 250 g fairtrade labeled chocolate compared to conventional chocolate. However, taste clearly dominates ethical considerations. The authors could distinguish three consumer segments, each with a different tradeoff between taste and fairtrade. One group clearly valued fairtrade positively, a second group valued fairtrade to a lesser extent and a third group did not seem to value fairtrade. Originality/value – Chocolate can be seen as a self-indulgent treat where taste is likely to dominate other characteristics. Therefore it is unsure to what extent ethical factors are included in consumer decisions. Interestingly the results indicate that a significant share of chocolate buyers still positively value fairtrade characteristics when selecting chocolate varieties.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference75 articles.

1. Amaya-Amaya, M. , Gerard, K. and Ryan, M. (2008), “Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell”, in Ryan, M. , Gerard, K. and Amaya-Amaya, M. (Eds), Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care , Springer, pp. 13-46.

2. Andorfer, V.A. and Liebe, U. (2012), “Research on fair trade consumption-a review”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 106 No. 4, pp. 415-435.

3. Annunziata, A. and Scarpato, D. (2014), “Factors affecting consumer attitudes towards food products with sustainable attributes”, Agricultural Economics , Vol. 60 No. 8, pp. 353-363.

4. Annunziata, A. , Ianuario, S. and Pascale, P. (2011), “Consumers’ attitudes towards labelling of ethical products: the case of organic and fair trade products”, Journal of Food Products Marketing , Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 518-535.

5. Barrientos, S. (2016), “Beyond fair trade: why are mainstream chocolate companies pursuing social and economic sustainability in cocoa sourcing?”, in Squicciarini, M. and Swinnen, J. (Eds), The Economics of Chocolate , Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3