Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to identify tensions that are emerging in the invention and implementation of social innovation by social entrepreneurial teams and highlights elements that influence the type of tension encountered.
Design/methodology/approach
Four cases are selected theoretically, studied individually, and compared to one another to identify tensions and patterns of tensions.
Findings
The findings reveal the predominant tensions related to goals and identity during social innovation invention and those related to time and knowledge during social innovation implementation. The size of the entrepreneurial team, the nature of the social innovation, and the interest orientation – that is, the overlap between entrepreneurial team members and beneficiaries – are found to play a role in the type of tensions encountered and their content.
Research limitations/implications
The chosen research approach limits the generalizability of the research results. Replication in other settings and with other types of social innovation is therefore encouraged.
Originality/value
In contrast to most existing studies, this research focuses on nascent social innovation projects borne by teams. It proposes that social-business tensions are not necessarily predominant in social innovation management. It suggests the importance of interest orientation as an underestimated factor in the study of social entrepreneurship.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference57 articles.
1. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict;Journal of Management,1997
2. Innovation and creativity in organizations;Journal of Management,2014
3. Andriopoulos, C. and Gotsi, M. (2017), “Methods of paradox”, in Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W., Jarzabkowski, P. and Langley, A. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 513-528.
4. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation;Organization Science,2009
5. Entrepreneurship research;Management Decision,2012
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献