Abstract
PurposeThe use of insects as food is a proposed solution for the increased demand for food worldwide, but it lacks acceptance because of restrictive emotional factors. This article aims to understand better customers' emotions’ role in considering and consuming insect-based food.Design/methodology/approachTo assess their acceptance, an experiment was developed with 38 participants living in Portugal to identify how people feel when consuming processed insect bars compared to cereal bars (of equal flavour). A video was recorded “before”, “during” and “after” the consumption of such foods, and the triggered emotions and affective states were identified using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) and the circumplex model of affect, respectively. After consumption, the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) was asked to be completed.FindingsIt was observed that the valence and arousal of the emotions and affective states triggered during consumption were higher in the insect bar than in the cereal bar. Its consumption resulted in surprise and a positive evaluation. Processed insect-based foods may result in a potentially increased acceptance of this new food alternative in the market.Originality/valuePrior studies briefly identified disgust as a primary emotion activated by insect-based food. The current research deeply studied emotional responses to insect-based processed foods in the Western world using the dimensional emotional models. This study offers arguments for the insect-based food industry to invest in processed food justified by its potential for acceptance. In addition, it motivates further research focused on other insect-based products (e.g. non-processed ones).
Reference59 articles.
1. Neuroimaging techniques in advertising research: main applications, development, and brain regions and processes;Sustainability (Switzerland),2021
2. Insects as food and feed: a review;Food Science and Technology (London),2015
3. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential;Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,1994
4. Bynion, T.-M. and Feldner, M.T. (2017), “Self-assessment manikin”, in Zeigler-Hill, V. and Shackelford, T.K. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Springer International, Cham, pp. 1-3, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_77-1.
5. Configural information in facial expression perception;Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance,2000