Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to critique and evaluate need-driven dementia compromised behavior theory and the health behavioral model using Meleis’ (2010) criteria of theory evaluation.
Design/methodology/approach
Theory critique using Meleis’ (2010) criteria of theory evaluation.
Findings
This paper provides a conclusion about each theory in terms of agitation in the elderly. Meleis’s (2010) criteria will be used for both theories to evaluate different components such as the relationship between structure and function, diagram of the theory, circle of the contagiousness, usefulness and external components.
Originality/value
The critique of the two theories broadened the nurses’ understanding of the connection between the NDB model and the behavior symptoms, including agitation and its related issues. Further studies need to be conducted to shed light on the other aspects of the behavioral symptoms in elderly with dementia that supports the results of this study, like its specific causes, trigger factors and other intervention strategies. Nurses should be able not only to understand the patient’s behavior symptoms but also to decode them into communication signals to meet their needs in a more effective way.
Subject
Community and Home Care,Gerontology
Reference33 articles.
1. Effects of a health-belief-model-based osteoporosis-and fall-prevention program on women at early old age;Applied Nursing Research,2021
2. Need-driven dementia-compromised behavior: an alternative view of disruptive behavior;American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease,1996
3. The life-span perspective of developmental psychology: abstract;Eta Evolutiva,1986
4. Effects of health belief model based nursing interventions offered at home visits on lymphedema prevention in women with breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial;Journal of Clinical Nursing,2020