Management challenges arising from the use of virtual work

Author:

Mihhailova Gerda

Abstract

PurposeLiterature on virtual and other new ways of work is diverse and confusing, indicating a need for a framework to structure and systematize the related terminology. The purpose of this empirical study is to address the lack of empirical research on how well (and if at all) characteristics of employees' national and occupational culture determine the management challenges and employees' satisfaction with virtual work arrangements.Design/methodology/approachEmpirical data was gathered using case study research. An Estonian and a Russian company operating in the service sector suited best as they had a diverse multinational workforce and several years of virtual work experience.FindingsThe paper concludes that occupational culture determines much better than national culture the employees' attitudes towards and satisfaction with virtual work arrangements.Research limitations/implicationsThe main limitation arose from the lack of national culture research in East European countries: for many of these nations, national culture dimensions/characteristics (e.g. like offered by Hofstede) are still unknown.Practical implicationsThe results help service organizations' managers to prepare a multinational workforce better for virtual work, knowing ahead the potential challenges and thus train the employees based on their occupational culture background.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to theory by offering a framework which enables to systematize the diverse range of terminology used for new, flexible ways of work. The case studies reveal a huge gap waiting to be filled with research on national culture characteristics of East European countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference33 articles.

1. Bots, P.W.G., Glasson, B.C. and Vogel, D.R. (1995), The International Office of the Future: A Problem Analysis, Technical University, Department of Systems Engineering, Delft.

2. Edwards, A. and Wilson, J.R. (2004), Implementing Virtual Teams, Gower Publishing, Aldershot.

3. Eichmann, H., Saupe, B. and Schwarz‐Wölzl, M. (2002), “Critical issues pertaining to the code of practice for global E‐work”, in Gareis, K., Lilischkis, S. and Mentrup, A. (Eds), Mapping the Mobile eWorkforce in Europe, Project Document, Centre for Social Innovation, Vienna, available at: www.empirica.biz/empirica/publikationen/documents/Gareis‐ea_MVW_2005.pdf (accessed July 5, 2007).

4. Fischer, K. and Fischer, M.D. (2001), The Distance Manager: A Hands‐On Guide To Managing Off‐Site Employees and Virtual Teams, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

5. Fontaine, G. (2002), “Teams in teleland: working effectively in geographically dispersed teams in the Asia Pacific”, Team Performance Management: An International Journal, Vol. 8 Nos 5/6, pp. 122‐33.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3