Varieties of capitalism in Europe: an inter-temporal comparison of HR policies

Author:

Pedrini Giulio

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the attitude of European firms towards human resource management (HRM) configuration and HRM practices on a country-level basis. Assuming the persistent relevance of institutional framework, the paper investigates the applicability of the varieties of capitalism (VoC) theory to these domains in European countries and their evolution between 1999 and 2005. Design/methodology/approach – The paper selects and groups together variables that are related to both HRM configuration and HRM practices using data coming from the survey performed in 2005 by the Cranfield Network on International HRM. Then, a hierarchical cluster analysis among 16 European countries is performed. Relevant varieties are obtained through the combined application of two stopping rules. Findings – Evidence shows that the evolution of HR policies over time is in line with an extended VoC approach that divides Europe in four VoC. One of these varieties (the “State” model), however, is not validated after a robustness check. Practical implications – For HR managers, the implementation of common personnel policies within the same variety of capitalism could represent a potential fertile ground for beneficial interactions and mutual learning among HR functions. In particular, the classification suggested in the paper does matter if an intervention on HRM practices is accompanied by a change in the participation of the HR department to the decision-making process and/or in the delegation of responsibilities between the HR department and the line management. Originality/value – The authors’ results contribute to the debate on the relationship between HRM and institutional context in two ways. First, they show that an extended VoC framework can explain the differentiation among European countries with regard to HRM domains. Notably, the correlation between the structure of the HR function and the intensity of HRM practices generates a clusterization of European countries based on at least three models of capitalism. Second, it emerges from the analysis that a substantial shift occurred with respect to the previous wave of the survey together with an increase of similarities between countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference70 articles.

1. Almond, P. (2011), “The sub-national embeddedness of international HRM”, Human Relations , Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 531-551.

2. Amable, B. (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism , Oxford University Press, Oxford.

3. Becker, B.E. and Gerhart, B. (1996), “The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 779-801.

4. Becker, B.E. , Huselid, M.A. and Ulrich, D. (2001), The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy and Performance , Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

5. Bondarouk, T. and Looise, J. (2005), “HR contribution to IT innovation implementation: results of three case studies”, Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 160-168.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Contextual and temporal effects on diversity action programmes in organisations;The International Journal of Human Resource Management;2024-09

2. Context is key: A 34‐country analysis investigating how similar HRM systems emerge from similar contexts;Human Resource Management;2024-01-03

3. Compensation policies and comparative capitalisms;European Journal of Industrial Relations;2022-02-28

4. New Public Management Model and Performance Appraisal System;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2022

5. Labor-Management Relations and Varieties of Capitalism;Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics;2021-12-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3