Author:
Evans David J.,Sezer Haluk
Abstract
PurposeThis paper sets out to estimate discount rates for EU members, on a consistent time preference basis, for application in the appraisal of social projects. The value of the discount rate can have an important influence on the allocation of funds between short‐term and long‐term uses.Design/methodology/approachA key component of the social discount rate is the elasticity of marginal utility of consumption (e) and it is estimated from OECD data relating to marginal and average rates of income tax. A tax model based on the principle of equal absolute sacrifice of satisfaction is employed.FindingsThe estimated discount rates, based on social time preference, mostly lie in the range 3‐5.5 per cent. The main source of variation in rates is differential growth in per capita consumption. Estimates of e are reasonably consistent and for 15 of the countries they lie in the range 1.3‐1.6.Research limitations/implicationsFor more comprehensive tax information, then additional data from each country's tax authority are required. The research on estimates of e and social time preference rates can be extended to cover non‐European countries.Practical implicationsIn the interests of a consistent equitable treatment of future generations, member countries of the EU should employ the same methodology in estimating social discount rates.Originality/valueThis paper applies a practical tax‐based approach to the estimation of e for a large number of European countries. The paper will be of interest to academics specialising in welfare economics and to practitioners involved in social project appraisal.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference32 articles.
1. Attanasio, O.P. and Browning, M. (1995), “Consumption over the life cycle and over the business cycle”, American Economic Review, Vol. 85 No. 5, pp. 1118‐37.
2. Besley, T. and Meghir, C. (1998), “Tax based savings incentives”, Technical Report September, London School of Economics, London.
3. Blue, E.N. and Tweeten, C. (1997), “The estimation of marginal utility of income for application to agricultural policy analysis”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 155‐69.
4. Blundell, R., Browning, M. and Meghir, C. (1994), “Consumer demand and the life‐cycle allocation of household expenditures”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 61, pp. 57‐80.
5. Broome, J. (1992), Counting the Cost of Global Warming, White Horse Press, Cambridge.
Cited by
62 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献