The intellectual foundations of the social market economy

Author:

Ebner Alexander

Abstract

PurposeThis paper suggests that an adequate understanding of the notion of the social market economy, which has become a prominent aspect of debates on the social model of the European Constitution, is to be assessed in the context of the historist tradition in German economic and social thought.Design/methodology/approachThe paper explores the intellectual history of the notion of the social market economy and its conceptual relevance for a dynamic European social model by highlighting Alfred Müller‐Armack's contributions to ordoliberalism and their relationship with German historism, in particular with Gustav von Schmoller's approach to Socialpolitik.FindingsThe paper finds that the decisive concern of the notion of the social market economy is the reconciliation of economic dynamism and social cohesion in a basic setting of legal rules and cultural values, reaching beyond common interpretations that focus more narrowly on institutional aspects of social policy.Practical implicationsBy highlighting the interplay of economic, social and cultural dimensions, the paper suggests an extension of the conceptual horizon of current debates on the social model of the European Union, promoting policy implications that account for the possibilities of balancing conflicting social interests in the process of integration.Originality/valueThe paper applies a reconstruction of the intellectual history of the notion of the social market economy to the problem of designing a social order for the European Union with its underlying discourse on the constitutional status of a European social market economy.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference51 articles.

1. Backhaus, J. (1994), “Gustav Schmoller and the problems of today”, History of Economic Ideas, Vol. 1/2 Nos 3/1, pp. 3‐25.

2. Betz, H.K. (1988), “How does the German historical school fit?”, History of Political Economy, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 409‐30.

3. Bilger, F. (1996), “Die Konkurrenz der Wirtschaftsstile und die Entwicklung der Europäischen Union”, in Klump, R. (Ed.), Wirtschaftskultur, Wirtschaftsstil und Wirtschaftsordnung: Methoden und Ergebnisse der Wirtschaftskulturforschung, Metropolis, Marburg, pp. 175‐90.

4. Boyer, R. (1993), “The convergence hypothesis revisited: globalization but still the century of nations?”, Working Paper No. 9403, CEPREMAP, Paris, August.

5. Bundesministerium der Justiz (1990), “Bundesgesetzblatt II, BGBl 1990 II 518, 29 Juni 1990”, Vertrag über die Schaffung einer Währungs‐, Wirtschafts‐ und Sozialunion zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, Bundesanzeiger, Bonn.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3