Abstract
PurposeBased on the approach of Timljonavich and Vogelsang, the purpose of this paper is to present empirical evidence of the role of the federal transfers on the β‐convergence process in Canadian provinces.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses information on annual personal income for the period 1926‐1999 to present empirical evidence about the notion of β‐convergence for the ten Canadian provinces.FindingsThe principal conclusion is that the inter‐provincial transfers were not determinant or decisive to the attainment of deterministic convergence in the Canadian provinces.Originality/valueWhile the issue of convergence has been analyzed especially using cross‐sectional data or panel data, this paper uses a time‐series methodology with statistics recently proposed by Vogelsang and Bunzel, which are robust to the presence of I(0) or I(1) disturbances.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference41 articles.
1. Abramovitz, M. (1988), “Catching up, forging ahead, and failing behind”, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 46, pp. 385‐406.
2. Barro, R. (1991), “Economic growth in a cross section of countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, pp. 407‐43.
3. Barro, R. (1997), Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross‐Country Empirical Study, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Baumol, W.J. (1986), “Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long‐run data show”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 72‐85.
5. Barro, R. and Sala‐I‐Martin, X. (1995), “Convergence”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, pp. 223‐51.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献