Abstract
Following Clarida and Taylor, the term structure of forward exchange premiums can be interpreted as multiple cointegration vectors, if it is assumed that departures from the risk‐neutral efficient markets hypothesis are stationary. This hypothesis is tested using spot rates and one‐month and three‐month forward rates for six European countries during the 1920s floating rate era. Beginning in late 1924, speculation about a return to gold may have resulted in a non‐stationary forward premium. However, except for this speculative period, the term structure of forward premiums was stationary for three currencies. Thus the empirical results presented are broadly consistent with the analysis of Taylor and McMahon, MacDonald and Taylor and Miller and Sutherland.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference37 articles.
1. Aliber, R.Z. (1962), “Speculation in the foreign exchanges: the European experience 1919‐1926”, Yale Economic Essays, Vol. 2, pp. 171‐245.
2. Baillie, R.T. and Bollerslev, T. (1989), “Common stochastic trends in a system of exchange rates”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 44, pp. 167‐81.
3. Baillie, R.T., Bollerslev, T. and Redfearn, M.R. (1993), “Bear squeezes, volatility spill‐overs and speculative attacks in the hyper‐inflation 1920s foreign exchange”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 12, pp. 511‐21.
4. Clarida, R.H. and Taylor, M. (1997), “The term structure of forward exchange premiums and the forecastability of spot exchange rates: correcting the errors”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 79, pp. 353‐61.
5. Corbae, D., Lim, K.G. and Ouliaris, S. (1992), “On cointegration and tests of forward market unbiasedness”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 74, pp. 728‐32.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献