Author:
Henson Jeremy A.,Beehr Terry
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to test the effects of subordinates’ individual differences or traits and their performance behavior on the formation of leaders’ LMX, based on leader-member exchange (LMX) theory, thus proposing that both who subordinates are and what they do may affect supervisors’ LMX perceptions.
Design/methodology/approach
Two studies were conducted. The first was a non-experimental field study and the second was a laboratory experiment.
Findings
Study 1, a non-experimental field study, HLM, showed that subordinates’ self-reported characteristics predict their leaders’ LMX ratings; Study 2, a laboratory experiment, showed that subordinate performance causes leaders’ LMX perceptions while holding subordinate’s individual differences constant.
Originality/value
The current research was the first to demonstrate experimentally that LMX develops over multiple interactions. Additionally, it demonstrates that task-oriented behavior (i.e. job performance) and personality characteristics (i.e. internal locus of control and self-efficacy) are predictors of LMX.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference83 articles.
1. Leadership: good, better, best;Organizational Dynamics,1985
2. Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test;Academy of Management Journal,1996
3. The nature of satisfaction with subordinates: its prediction and importance to supervisors;Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2006