Sector‐specific regulation in European electronic communications – meant to disappear?

Author:

Berhin Daniel,Godart Frédéric,Jollès Maya,Nihoul Paul

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to question the disappearance of sector‐specific regulation in European electronic communications markets.Design/methodology/approachTo show that sector‐specific regulation will remain, five arguments are developed based on different disciplines: law, economics, political science and sociology.FindingsIt is found that sector‐specific regulation has already been in place for 15 years and there is no concrete indication that it will end soon. Competition law has intrinsic limitations, which, arguably, do not make it possible for authorities to resort only to that body of the law to ensure a smooth functioning of the electronic communications markets. The balance of power in the EU leads to sector‐specific regulation being maintained in the years ahead as the ideal way for European institutions to intervene in electronic communications markets. The electronic communications market requires regulation going beyond competition law in order to ensure the realization of non‐economic purposes. The implementation of sector‐specific regulation might contribute to concentrating the electronic communications markets.Practical implicationsContrary to the claims of the European institutions that sector‐specific regulation in the electronic communication markets will lose its relevance, this paper argues that it is likely to remain for the foreseeable future.Originality/valueThe paper shows that deregulating a sector is not an easy task and that ex ante regulation is a key legal instrument for the proper functioning of a market.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Reference17 articles.

1. Curien, N. (2000), Economie des réseaux, La Découverte, Paris.

2. European Commission (2003a), European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2003: Report on the Implementation of the EU Electronic Communications Regulatory Package, Communication from the Commission to the Council of the European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, European Commission, Brussels, 19 November.

3. European Commission (2003b), Recommendation on Relevant Product and Service Markets within the Electronic Communications Sector Susceptible to ex ante Regulation in Accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communication Networks and Services, OJ L 114/45, European Commission, Brussels, 11 February.

4. Finger, M. and Voets, A. (2003), Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Telecommunications Regulator, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne.

5. Landis, J. (1938), The Administrative Process, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The multifaceted concept of disruption: A typology;Journal of Business Research;2024-01

2. Turning Points and the Space of Possibles: A Relational Perspective on the Different Forms of Uncertainty;Applying Relational Sociology;2013

3. New regulatory institution for the convergence of broadcasting and telecommunications: A Korean case;Government Information Quarterly;2011-04

4. Mobilizing Identities;Theory, Culture & Society;2007-12

5. Trans-European Telecommunication Networks;Strategy and Policy for Trans-European Networks;2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3