Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study commissioned by an aircraft producer that is concerned about the efficiency of its new product development process and the high number of engineering changes generated during aerospace programs.Design/methodology/approachThe paper focuses on nine structural design projects and explores the factors explaining the inter‐project differences in the number of engineering changes required after the structural drawings are released to the methods department. The method of inquiry used in this paper combines questionnaire‐based measurement of design performance with in‐depth semi‐structured interviews of managers and designers.FindingsThe research results suggest that, in an industrial context where both time pressure and labour shortage are considerable, design practices such as functional diversity, intense communication, collocation and strong project leadership, are associated with higher design performance. Furthermore, in a specific organizational context where the design work is divided among various companies located in different regions, effective partner integration is another key success factor.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough the strength of the findings is inevitably limited by the small number of observations, the results raise some important questions about the effect of time pressure and labour shortage on product development performance.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that design performance is likely to increase if the production sustaining phase is actively promoted within aerospace companies, since this activity provides designers with considerable learning opportunities.Originality/valueUsing sensitive internal data on engineering changes and rich qualitative material, this paper indicates how design performance can be improved in organizations that tend to rely on design rework and other safety nets to achieve their quality objectives and comply with industry regulations.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference51 articles.
1. Adler, P.S. (1995), “Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: the case of the design/manufacture interface”, Organization Science, Vol. 6, pp. 147‐67.
2. Allen, T.J. (1971), “Communications, technology transfer, and the role of technological gatekeepers”, R&D Management, Vol. 1, pp. 14‐21.
3. Antoni, M., Nilsson‐Witell, L. and Dahlgaard, J.J. (2005), “Inter‐project improvement in product development”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 22 No. 9, pp. 876‐93.
4. Becker, M.C. and Zirpoli, F. (2003), “Organizing new product development: knowledge hollowing‐out and knowledge integration – the FIAT auto case”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23 No. 9, pp. 1033‐61.
5. Blackburn, J.D. (1992), “Time based competition: white collar activities”, Business Horizon, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 96‐101.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献