Police encounters with juveniles revisited

Author:

Bazemore Gordon,Senjo Scott

Abstract

Examines the extent to which community‐oriented police officers (COP) differ from regular patrol officers in their view of their role in the response to juveniles and in style and intensity of interaction. Based on qualitative field research in a densely populated Southeastern city, initial findings suggest that while COPs devote equal attention to traditional police functions (e.g. law enforcement), they adopt different styles of carrying out these functions (e.g. proactive problem solving). In addition, COP officers more routinely practice juvenile crime prevention, monitoring and diversion and clearly articulate these functions as core components of their role orientation. Questions for future research include the extent to which the new more intimate relationship between police and juveniles in COP areas will increase arrests or promote diversion, whether increased discretion will result in increased harassment or improved informal dispute resolution, and whether officers practicing effective diversion and advocacy will be encouraged to continue or see their efforts undercut by competing departmental priorities or by bureaucratic policies that increase formal processing.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference63 articles.

1. Alder, C. and Wundersitz, J. (1994, Family Conferencing and Juvenile Justice: The Way Forward or Misplaced Optimism?, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, Australia.

2. Bayley, D. (1988, “Community policing: a report from the devil’s advocate”, in Green, J. and Mastrofski, S. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality?, Praeger, New York, NY.

3. Bazemore, G. and Cole, A. (1993, “Implementing and evaluating community policing: a case study in an urban community”, paper presented at the SECOPA National Conference, Orlando, FL, October.

4. Bazemore, G. and Cole, A. (1994, “Police in the ‘laboratory’ of the neighborhood: evaluating problem oriented strategies in a medium sized city”, American Journal of Police, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 119‐47.

5. Bazemore, G. and Umbreit, M. (1995, “Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: retributive or restorative responses to youth crime”, Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 296‐316.

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3