What is the biggest question in CSR research?

Author:

Ahen Frederick,Zettinig Peter

Abstract

Purpose – Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an issue-oriented substantive domain. Nevertheless, there are countless socio-economic, medico-techno-scientific, environmental and ethical philosophical questions that are far from being settled. In pursuit of a more desirable and sustainable future, this work problematizes current corporate responsibility (CR) research, education and practice. Design/methodology/approach – This contribution provides a critical perspective on the future of CR research and practice and offers a way forward based on theoretical prescience. Findings – The paper delineates a taxonomy of typical crises, categorized as burning, existential, overlooked and neglected crises. This taxonomy can be used as a tool for all forms of scenario analysis, empirical work and policymaking. This allows various futures issues to be given targeted interventions, assigned a focal theory, or allocated differentiated resources and appropriate time and space depending on their technical nature and the institutional context within which the issues unfold. Social implications – This paper argues that CR research risks losing steam despite its near ubiquitous nature and the major contributions hitherto made. Nevertheless, when problems are strategically thought out in the light of the taxonomy above, they provide promising avenues for insightful research and value-creating practice to meet the expectations of both business and society. Originality/value – A profound chasm exists between CR practice and rhetoric. This void is particularly stark when we consider the interface between science and technology and developing economies. This paper explores desirable futures for CR while analyzing what is possible and probable.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference79 articles.

1. Ackoff, R.L. (1974), Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems , Wiley, New York, NY.

2. Africa Progress Panel (2013), “African progress report 2013”, available at: http://africaprogresspanel.org/index.php?cID=959 (accessed 5 November 2013).

3. Ahen, F. and Zettinig, P. (2013), “Institutional and market forces: the dominant logic of strategic CR, and innovative value co-creation”, in Gonzalez-Perez, M.A. and Leonard, L. (Eds), International Business, Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice ), Emerald Eco-politics Publications, Bingley.

4. Alcadipani, R. , Khan, F. , Gantman, E. and Nkomo, S. (2012), “Southern voices in management and organization knowledge”, Organization , Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 131-143.

5. Banerjee, A.V. and Duflo, E. (2011), Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty , Public Affairs, New York, NY.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Book review;Critical Perspectives on International Business;2023-01-05

2. International mega-corruption Inc.: the structural violence against sustainable development;critical perspectives on international business;2021-01-05

3. Individual choice of management research agendas;Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences;2020-02-11

4. Globalisolationism and its Implications for TNCs’ Global Responsibility;Humanistic Management Journal;2019-06-12

5. Institutional Voids and the Philanthropization of CSR Practices: Insights from Developing Economies;Sustainability;2018-07-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3