Author:
Ahen Frederick,Zettinig Peter
Abstract
Purpose
– Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an issue-oriented substantive domain. Nevertheless, there are countless socio-economic, medico-techno-scientific, environmental and ethical philosophical questions that are far from being settled. In pursuit of a more desirable and sustainable future, this work problematizes current corporate responsibility (CR) research, education and practice.
Design/methodology/approach
– This contribution provides a critical perspective on the future of CR research and practice and offers a way forward based on theoretical prescience.
Findings
– The paper delineates a taxonomy of typical crises, categorized as burning, existential, overlooked and neglected crises. This taxonomy can be used as a tool for all forms of scenario analysis, empirical work and policymaking. This allows various futures issues to be given targeted interventions, assigned a focal theory, or allocated differentiated resources and appropriate time and space depending on their technical nature and the institutional context within which the issues unfold.
Social implications
– This paper argues that CR research risks losing steam despite its near ubiquitous nature and the major contributions hitherto made. Nevertheless, when problems are strategically thought out in the light of the taxonomy above, they provide promising avenues for insightful research and value-creating practice to meet the expectations of both business and society.
Originality/value
– A profound chasm exists between CR practice and rhetoric. This void is particularly stark when we consider the interface between science and technology and developing economies. This paper explores desirable futures for CR while analyzing what is possible and probable.
Subject
Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference79 articles.
1. Ackoff, R.L.
(1974),
Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems
, Wiley, New York, NY.
2. Africa Progress Panel
(2013), “African progress report 2013”, available at: http://africaprogresspanel.org/index.php?cID=959 (accessed 5 November 2013).
3. Ahen, F.
and
Zettinig, P.
(2013), “Institutional and market forces: the dominant logic of strategic CR, and innovative value co-creation”, in
Gonzalez-Perez, M.A.
and
Leonard, L.
(Eds),
International Business, Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice
), Emerald Eco-politics Publications, Bingley.
4. Alcadipani, R.
,
Khan, F.
,
Gantman, E.
and
Nkomo, S.
(2012), “Southern voices in management and organization knowledge”,
Organization
, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 131-143.
5. Banerjee, A.V.
and
Duflo, E.
(2011),
Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty
, Public Affairs, New York, NY.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献