Abstract
PurposeTo provide a close, detailed analysis of the frequency, nature, and depth of visible use of Michel Foucault's works by library and information science/studies (LIS) scholars.Design/methodology/approachThe study conducted extensive full-text searches in a large number of electronically available LIS journal databases to find citations of Foucault's works, then examined each cited article to evaluate the nature and depth of use.FindingsMost uses of Foucault are brief or in passing. In-depth explorations of Foucault's works are comparatively rare and relatively little-used by other LIS scholars. Yet the relatively brief uses of Foucault encompass a wide array of different topics spread across a wide spectrum of LIS journal literature.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was limited to articles from particular relatively prominent LIS journals. Results might vary if different journals or non-journal literature were studied. More sophisticated bibliometric techniques might reveal different relative performance among journals and might better test, confirm, or reject various patterns and relationships found here. Other research approaches, such as discourse analysis, social network analysis, or scholar interviews, might reveal patterns of use and influence not visible in this literature sample.Originality/valueThis intensive study of both quality and quantity of citations may challenge some existing assumptions regarding citation analysis, plus illuminating Foucault scholarship. It also indicates possible problems for future application of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to similar depth-of-use studies.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference43 articles.
1. Knowledge organization: a sociohistorical analysis and critique;The Library Quarterly,2006
2. Anderson, K. (2009), “Proposed journal ranking list for archives and records management”, available at: aeri2009.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/archival-journal-ranking-aeri.doc, http://ebook-free-downloads.com/ebook-doc-free-doc-download-journal-page-5.htm (accessed 19 August, 2019).
3. The visibility of information science and library science research in bibliometric mapping of the LIS field;The Library Quarterly,2010
4. What does it mean to be ‘Critical’ in IS research?;Journal of Information Technology,2002
5. Declining Derrida: integrity, tensegrity, and the preservation of archives from deconstruction;Archivaria,1999
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献