Foucault's toolbox: use of Foucault's writings in LIS journal literature, 1990–2016

Author:

Dewey Scott HamiltonORCID

Abstract

PurposeTo provide a close, detailed analysis of the frequency, nature, and depth of visible use of Michel Foucault's works by library and information science/studies (LIS) scholars.Design/methodology/approachThe study conducted extensive full-text searches in a large number of electronically available LIS journal databases to find citations of Foucault's works, then examined each cited article to evaluate the nature and depth of use.FindingsMost uses of Foucault are brief or in passing. In-depth explorations of Foucault's works are comparatively rare and relatively little-used by other LIS scholars. Yet the relatively brief uses of Foucault encompass a wide array of different topics spread across a wide spectrum of LIS journal literature.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was limited to articles from particular relatively prominent LIS journals. Results might vary if different journals or non-journal literature were studied. More sophisticated bibliometric techniques might reveal different relative performance among journals and might better test, confirm, or reject various patterns and relationships found here. Other research approaches, such as discourse analysis, social network analysis, or scholar interviews, might reveal patterns of use and influence not visible in this literature sample.Originality/valueThis intensive study of both quality and quantity of citations may challenge some existing assumptions regarding citation analysis, plus illuminating Foucault scholarship. It also indicates possible problems for future application of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to similar depth-of-use studies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference43 articles.

1. Knowledge organization: a sociohistorical analysis and critique;The Library Quarterly,2006

2. Anderson, K. (2009), “Proposed journal ranking list for archives and records management”, available at: aeri2009.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/archival-journal-ranking-aeri.doc, http://ebook-free-downloads.com/ebook-doc-free-doc-download-journal-page-5.htm (accessed 19 August, 2019).

3. The visibility of information science and library science research in bibliometric mapping of the LIS field;The Library Quarterly,2010

4. What does it mean to be ‘Critical’ in IS research?;Journal of Information Technology,2002

5. Declining Derrida: integrity, tensegrity, and the preservation of archives from deconstruction;Archivaria,1999

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. References;Studies in Information;2023-06-30

2. Metatheories, Theories, and Models;Studies in Information;2023-06-30

3. Surveillance as information practice;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2023-01-18

4. Diffusion of theories and theoretical models in the Ibero‐American research on information behavior;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2021-10-18

5. Descendants of the modernist museum: tracing the musealisation of Swedish national parks;Visual Studies;2021-03-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3