Author:
Schofield Cathy,Burton Francesca
Abstract
PurposeBased on the experiences of those delivering the dissertation module on a level 6 BSc sport top‐up year, where students progress from many further education colleges and higher education institutions, from differing foundation degrees, it was observed that there was a variable comprehension of research methods by the progressing students. It was felt that this lack of knowledge and confidence with respect to research methods had a negative impact on their ability to undertake research and to produce scientific reports for the dissertation. This paper aims to investigate this issue.Design/methodology/approachAfter investigating the levels of confidence of FdSc sport science students and lecturers with respect to their research methods knowledge and understanding, a research methods teaching toolkit was developed using sport‐specific examples and activities to increase the amount of experiential learning.FindingsThe paper finds that in the design and construction of this initial toolkit it has become apparent that there are a vast number of approaches that can be taken to encourage student engagement with research methods within a sport and exercise science discipline.Research limitations/implicationsAs the development stage of the toolkit is completed the authors aim to evaluate the toolkit during the next academic year, assessing students' progress by comparison to a matched control group. This will be supplemented by lecturers' evaluation in order to refine the toolkit and make it available in varying formats to all institutions within University of Plymouth Colleges and beyond.Originality/valueThis paper provides information on the development stage of a toolkit aimed at supporting the research methods of sport science undergraduates and lecturers.
Reference13 articles.
1. Brew, A. and Boud, D. (1995), “Teaching and research: establishing the vital link with learning”, Higher Education, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 261‐73.
2. Bridges, G.G., Pershing, J.L., Gillmore, G.M. and Bates, K.A. (1998), “Teaching quantitative research methods: a quasi‐experimental analysis”, Teaching Sociology, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 14‐28.
3. Ewan, C. and Calvert, D. (2000), “The crisis of scientific research”, in Garrick, J. and Rhodes, C. (Eds), Research and Knowledge at Work: Perspectives, Case Studies and Innovative Strategies, Routledge, London, pp. 51‐74.
4. Gillmore, G.M. and Greenwald, A. (1994), “The effects of course demands and grading leniency on student ratings of instruction”, Office of Educational Assessment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, pp. 1‐19.
5. Hubbell, L. (1994), “Teaching research methods: an experimental and heterodoxical approach”, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 60‐4.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献