Paradigms, paradoxes and professionalism

Author:

Bond Emma,Goodchild Tim

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine current key debates on learning technologies in the everyday life of lecturers and explores their experiences of learning technologies.Design/methodology/approachThe research adopted a mixed method ethnographic approach to explore the perceptions of academics at a new university in the UK. The narrative and image data was collected via 30 interviews and an online forum and then subjected to grounded theory analysis. This study presents the findings of the study and discusses aspects of quality and meaningful engagement by academic staff with learning technologies in a higher education environment.FindingsAnalysis of the data revealed the central concepts of paradigms, paradoxes and professionalism. The diversity of perspectives of staff and students, skills, motivations and capabilities is fundamental to developing, supporting and promoting the innovative use of e‐learning and learning technologies in learning, teaching and assessment.Originality/valueThis study examined the reality of lecturers’ relationships with learning technologies in everyday life and the diversity of those lived experiences in relation to social change and educational ideologies. This study is, therefore, significant and adds to knowledge and understanding of academics’ perspectives which Hanson claims have previously been neglected. This research also contributes to previous studies of e‐learning and Actor Network theory (ANT).

Publisher

Emerald

Reference57 articles.

1. Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. (2007), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age, Routledge, London.

2. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.

3. Bennett, S., Maton, K. and Kervin, L. (2008), “The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 775‐786.

4. Benton, T. and Craib, I. (2001), Philosophy of Social Science, Palgrave, Basingstoke.

5. Britnell, J., Restiani Andriati, R. and Wilson, L. (2009), “Learning space design with an inclusive planning process promotes user engagement”, EDUCAUSE Quarterly (EQ), Vol. 32 No. 4.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Students’ Perceptions of the Sustainability of Distance Learning Systems in the Post-COVID-19: A Qualitative Perspective;Sustainability;2022-06-16

2. A qualitative study of students' perspective on e-learning adoption in India;Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education;2020-03-14

3. Teaching Across Time and Space;Developing Technology Mediation in Learning Environments;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3