Spatial thinking, gender and immaterial affective labour in the post-Fordist academic library

Author:

Nicholson Karen P.ORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to use spatial thinking (space-time) as a lens through which to examine the ways in which the socio-economic conditions and values of the post-Fordist academy work to diminish and even subsume the immaterial affective labour of librarians even as it serves to reproduce the academy.Design/methodology/approachThe research question informing this paper asks, In what ways does spatial thinking help us to better understand the immaterial, invisible and gendered labour of academic librarians' public service work in the context of the post-Fordist university? This question is explored using a conceptual approach and a review of recent library information science (LIS) literature that situates the academic library in the post-Fordist knowledge economy.FindingsThe findings suggest that the feminized and gendered immaterial labour of public service work in academic libraries – a form of reproductive labour – remains invisible and undervalued in the post-Fordist university, and that academic libraries function as a procreative, feminized spaces.Originality/valueSpatial thinking offers a corrective to the tendency in LIS to foreground time over space. It affords new insights into the spatial and temporal aspects of information work in the global neoliberal knowledge economy and suggests a new spatio-temporal imaginary of the post-Fordist academic library as a site of waged work.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference86 articles.

1. Bodies, brains, and machines: an exploration of the relationship between the material and affective states of librarians and information systems;Library Trends,2020

2. Re-conceiving time in reference and information services work: a qualitative secondary analysis;Journal of Documentation,2017

3. Bright, K. (2018), “A woman of color's work is never done: intersectionality, emotional and invisible labor in reference and information work”, in Chou, R.L. and Pho, A. (Eds), Pushing the Margins: Women of Color and Intersectionality in LIS, Library Juice Press, Sacramento, CA, pp. 163-196.

4. In pursuit of antiracist social justice: denaturalizing whiteness in the academic library;Library Trends,2015

5. Buschman, J.E. and Leckie, G.J. (Eds), (2007), “Introduction”, in The Library as Place: History, Community, and Culture, Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Teaching Knowledge Synthesis Methods through Online Research Consultations;Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship;2023-12-19

2. A Pedagogy of Possibility;Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship;2023-12-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3