Using the domain analytical approach in the study of information practices in biomedicine

Author:

Roos AnnikkiORCID,Hedlund Turid

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the information practices of the researchers in biomedicine using the domain analytical approach. Design/methodology/approach The domain analytical research approach used in the study of the scientific domain of biomedicine leads to studies into the organization of sciences. By using Whitley’s dimensions of “mutual dependence” and “task uncertainty” in scientific work as a starting point the authors were able to reanalyze previously collected data. By opening up these concepts in the biomedical research work context, the authors analyzed the distinguishing features of the biomedical domain and the way these features affected researchers’ information practices. Findings Several indicators representing “task uncertainty” and “mutual dependence” in the scientific domain of biomedicine were identified. This study supports the view that in biomedicine the task uncertainty is low and researchers are mutually highly dependent on each other. Hard competition seems to be one feature, which is behind the explosion of the data and publications in this domain. This fact, on its part is directly related to the ways information is searched, followed, used and produced. The need for new easy to use services or tools for searching and following information in so called “hot” topics came apparent. Originality/value The study highlights new information about information practices in the biomedical domain. Whitley’s theory enabled a thorough analysis of the cultural and social nature of the biomedical domain and it proved to be useful in the examination of researchers’ information practices.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference36 articles.

1. Bates, M.J. (2005), “An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models”, in Erdelez, F.S. and Lynne McKechnie, K.E. (Eds), Theories of Information Behavior, Information Today, Medford, OR, pp. 1-24.

2. Cyberinfrastructure: empowering a ‘third way’ in biomedical research;Science,2005

3. Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach;Information Processing & Management,2006

4. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources;Journal of Information Science,2007

5. Online resources of cancer data: barriers, benefits and lessons;Briefings in Bioinformatics,2011

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Domain analysis;EM QUESTAO;2024

2. References;Studies in Information;2023-06-30

3. Research Design, Methodologies, and Methods;Studies in Information;2023-06-30

4. Forensically reconstructing biomedical maintenance labor: PDF metadata under the epistemic conditions of COVID ‐19;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2021-04-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3