A capability approach to restructuring processes

Author:

Bonvin Jean‐Michel,Dif‐Pradalier Maël,Moachon Eric

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine to what extent and under which conditions restructuring processes allow workers to effectively voice their concerns, with a view to influencing the restructuring logic and transforming its outcomes.Design/methodology/approachIn‐depth case studies with semi‐structured interviews, documentary analysis and a survey, all conducted at firm‐level (taking also into account the impact of the European Workers’ Council when relevant).FindingsBoth settings (be it the Swiss flexible labour law and collective labour agreements or the protective professional status enjoyed by the French workers) do not guarantee the enhancement of workers’ capability set in restructuring processes. Whatever the entitlements and the cognitive and political resources available to the workers, two conditions are crucial to enhancing their capability for work and for voice: workers’ ability to re‐build collectives; and an adequate regulatory framework imposing on employers and shareholders the duty to negotiate.Originality/valueThe paper suggests another way of assessing restructuring processes and outcomes based on the capability approach, and demonstrates its greater relevance compared to economic or managerialist views of restructuring, based on efficiency and profitability.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference18 articles.

1. Aubert, G. (2005), “L’entreprise et le droit du travail: l’exemple Suisse”, Droit social, Vol. 2, February, pp. 147‐151.

2. Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1991), De la justification. Les Économies de la grandeur, Gallimard, Paris.

3. Bonvin, J.‐M. and Farvaque, N. (2008), Amartya Sen, Une politique de la liberté, Michalon, Paris.

4. Carter, C. and Mueller, F. (2002), “The ‘long march’ of the management modernizers: ritual, rhetoric and rationality”, Human Relations, Vol. 55 No. 11, pp. 1325‐1354.

5. Deakin, S. and Whittaker, H. (2007), “Re‐embedding the corporation? Comparative perspectives on corporate governance, employment relations and corporate social responsibility”, Corporate Governance, An International Review, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1‐4.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3