How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents?

Author:

Jervis Matthew,Masoodian Masood

Abstract

Purpose – This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach – An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings – The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications – The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value – Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference40 articles.

1. Barreau, D.K. (1995), “Context as a factor in personal information management systems”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 46 No. 5, pp. 327-339.

2. Barreau, D. and Nardi, B.A. (1995), “Finding and reminding: file organization from the desktop”, SIGCHI Bulletin, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 39-43.

3. Boardman, R. (2004), “Improving tool support for personal information management”, PhD thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK, available at: www.iis.ee.ic.ac.uk/∼rick/thesis/boardman04-thesis.pdf (accessed 20 January 2013).

4. Boardman, R. and Sasse, M.A. (2004), “Stuff goes into the computer and doesn't come out: a cross-tool study of personal information management”, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 583-590.

5. Bondarenko, O. (2006), “Task switching in detail: task identification, switching strategies, and influencing factors”, in Proceedings of the ICEIS Doctoral Consortium, INSTICC, pp. 72-83.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3