Health-related misinformation and public governance of COVID-19 in South Africa

Author:

Kariuki Paul,Ofusori Lizzy Oluwatoyin,Goyayi Maria Lauda,Subramaniam Prabhakar Rontala

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper was to examine health-related misinformation proliferation during COVID-19 pandemic and its implications on public governance in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach Because of COVID-19 related restrictions, this study conducted a systematic review. The researchers searched several search engines which include PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus to identify relevant studies. A total of 252 peer reviewed research papers were identified. These research papers were furthered filtered, and a total of 44 relevant papers were eventually selected Findings There is a relationship between the spread of health-related misinformation and public governance. Government coordination and institutional coherence across the different spheres of governance is affected when there are multiple sources of information that are unverified and uncoordinated. Research limitations/implications This study was limited to a systematic review because of COVID-19 restrictions, and therefore, actual data could not be collected. Moreover, this study was limited to health-related communication, and therefore, its findings can only be generalized to the health sector. Practical implications Future research in this subject should consider actual data collection from the departments of health and communications to gain an in-depth understanding of misinformation and its implications on public governance from their perspective as frontline departments as far as government communication is concerned. Social implications Misinformation is an impediment to any fight against a public health emergency. Institutions which regulate communications technology and monitor misinformation should work harder in enforcing the law to deter information peddlers from their practice. This calls for reviewing existing regulation so that online spaces are safer for communicating health-related information. Originality/value Effective health communication remains a priority for the South African Government during COVID-19. However, with health-related misinformation on the increase, it is imperative to mitigate the spread to ensure it does not impede effective public governance. Government departments in South Africa are yet to develop policies that mitigate the spread of misinformation, and this paper may assist them in doing so.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems,Management Information Systems

Reference64 articles.

1. The impact of social media on panic during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: online questionnaire study;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2020

2. COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory: social network analysis of Twitter data;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2020

3. Drug information, misinformation, and disinformation on social media: a content analysis study;Journal of Public Health Policy,2018

4. How South Africa's ministerial advisory committee on COVID-19 can be optimised;SAMJ: South African Medical Journal,2020

5. Baines, D. and Elliott, R. (2020), “Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: an urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic”, Discussion Papers 20. Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3