A framework for improving quality in misuse case models

Author:

El‐Attar Mohamed

Abstract

PurposeSecurity is a vital requirement for software systems. Misuse case models allow system designers to inject security considerations within their designs early in the development cycle rather than patching an end system with security mechanisms after it was developed. The notation and syntactical rules of misuse case models are relatively simple. However, misuse case modeling practitioners are highly vulnerable to modeling pitfalls, creating defective models that can have catastrophic effects downstream in the development cycle. This paper seeks to present a framework that unitizes antipatterns to help remedy defective misuse case models and poor modeling practices.Design/methodology/approachA repository of antipatterns was constructed and formatted to be machine‐readable whenever possible so that it can be utilized by the proposed framework. The feasibility of the proposed approach was then demonstrated using a real‐world misuse case model of an online bookstore system.FindingsThe results indicate that the overall quality and clarity of the bookstore misuse case model is improved by applying the proposed technique and framework.Research limitations/implicationsThis research work presents a series of domain‐independent antipatterns. Users of this framework may be interested to develop domain‐dependent antipatterns to better suit their modeling and development needs.Originality/valueThe proposed approach will help misuse case modelers, especially novice ones, to improve the quality of their current models as well as future models.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference52 articles.

1. Adolph, S. and Bramble, P. (2002), Patterns for Effective Use Cases, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

2. Alexander, I.F. (2002), “Initial industrial experience of misuse cases in trade‐off analysis”, Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'02), Essen, Germany.

3. Anda, B. and Sjøberg, I.K. (2002), “Towards an inspection technique for use case models”, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 127‐34.

4. Anderson, E., Bradley, M. and Brinko, R. (1997), “Use case and business rules: styles of documenting business rules in use cases”, Addendum to the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object‐oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications.

5. Armour, F. and Miller, G. (2000), Advanced Use Case Modeling, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A study of existing use case extensions and experience: a systematic review;International Journal of Computer Mathematics: Computer Systems Theory;2020-09-17

2. A Systematic Review and Analytical Evaluation of Security Requirements Engineering Approaches;Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering;2019-08-06

3. Refactoring Misuse Case Diagrams using Model Transformation;Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering;2019

4. Vulnerability Identification and Misuse Case Classification Framework;Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing;2017-11-25

5. Proposed Algorithm for Identification of Vulnerabilities and Associated Misuse Cases Using CVSS, CVE Standards During Security Requirements Elicitation Phase;Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing;2017-11-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3