Measurement in business processes: a systematic review

Author:

Sánchez González Laura,García Rubio Félix,Ruiz González Francisco,Piattini Velthuis Mario

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the current state of the art and trends with regard to business process measurement by means of a systematic review of literature.Design/methodology/approachThe results are obtained through a systematic review carried out according to existing relevant guidelines. Additionally, a specific methodology through which to systematically obtain all the most important journals is followed. In total, 19 relevant articles are selected and later analyzed. A subsequent critical analysis of the data obtained is applied to identify the gaps in the current literature.FindingsA considerable effort has been made by researchers in the field of business process measurement, particularly in recent years. Many of the defined measures for business processes have been applied to models (approximately 77 per cent). Most of the initiatives concerning business measurement have been adapted from the software engineering field. A small percentage of the existing business process measures has been empirically validated.Originality/valueThe results presented contribute towards providing an updated overview of the current state of research into business process measurement, in order to identify existing research gaps and concerns on which ongoing and future research efforts on this topic can be focused.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference43 articles.

1. Aversano, L., Bodhuin, T., Canfora, G. and Tortorella, M. (2004), “A framework for measuring business processes based on GQM”, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) – Track 1, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, p. 10012.1.

2. Biolchini, J.C., Gomes, P., Cruz, A.C. and Horta, G. (2005), “Systematic review in software engineering”, Technical Report RT‐ES 679/05, Systems Engineering and Computer Science Department, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.

3. Biolchini, J.C., Mian, P.G., Cruz, A.C., Conte, T.U. and Horta, G. (2007), “Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering”, Adv. Eng. Inform., Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 133‐51.

4. Briand, L.C., El Eman, K. and Morasca, E.S. (1995), “Theoretical and empirical validation of software product measures”, Technical Report ISERN‐95‐03, International Software Engineering Research Network, Kaiserslautern.

5. Briand, L.C., Morasca, E.S. and Basili, V.R. (1996), “Property‐based software engineering measurement”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 68‐86.

Cited by 92 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3