Knowledge management initiatives in Indian public and private sector organizations

Author:

Chawla Deepak,Joshi Himanshu

Abstract

PurposeThere is no single way of achieving business success. The concept of knowledge management (KM) builds on the existing management practices, integrating them into a philosophy for improving performance. This paper aims to understand the various dimensions of KM and how they differ in public and private sector organizations in India. It also attempts to identify the dimensions where one sector is better than the other and areas needing improvement.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses a sample comprising 16 private and public sector organizations. A convenient sampling scheme was used. The extent of KM practices was evaluated with respect to dimensions, namely process, leadership, technology, culture and measurement.FindingsThe paper empirically shows that private sector organizations fare better statistically on all dimensions compared to public sector organizations. Although the private sector is ahead of the public sector on the raw mean scores of various dimensions, it has still a long way to go as the scores are below four on a scale of five. The scores are just satisfactory and there is further scope for improvement.Research limitations/implicationsThe study uses a sample of four public sector organizations and the findings may lack generalization. Therefore, it would be interesting to verify the findings using a larger sample size.Practical implicationsThe paper can serve as a best practice document for public and private sector organizations interested in adopting KM for improving performance.Originality/valueThe paper tries to bring forth concern areas for KM in Indian public and private sector organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference38 articles.

1. American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) and Arthur Anderson Consulting, 1995 (1995), Knowledge management assessment tool, available at: http://kwork.org/White_Papers/kmat.html.

2. Bukowitz, W.R. and Williams, R.L. (1999), “Knowledge management process framework”, The Knowledge Management Field Book, Financial Times/Prentice‐Hall, London, pp. 9‐12.

3. Chadha, S.K. and Kapoor, D. (2010), “A study on knowledge management practices of auto component manufacturing companies in Ludhiana City”, The IUP Journal of Management, Vol. 8 No. 1 and 2, pp. 68‐76.

4. Chatzkel, J. (2004), “Establising a global KM initiative: the WIPRO story”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 6‐18.

5. Cong, X. and Pandya, K.V. (2003), “Issues of knowledge management in the public sector”, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 25‐33.

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3