Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of foreign venture capital (VC)/private equity (PE) ownership and other types of foreign investors on the access to external finance, in terms of credit provision, by the independent high-tech small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the European context.
Design/methodology/approach
The research methodology is based on the analysis of a panel sample consisting of 1,138 firms from 23 European Union countries for the period 2006-2015. To statistically test the two defined research hypotheses, a panel model was run using 2SLS estimation.
Findings
The findings show that foreign ownership has a positive but partial role in improving the availability of external funding for independent high-tech SMEs. Foreign VC/PE ownership seems to facilitate the global accessibility of external financing but not the access to bank lending; on the contrary, other forms of foreign ownership (excluding VC/PE) seem to increase only the access to bank lending.
Practical implications
In order to open their businesses to a global spectrum of investment opportunities and increase the potentials of full development, small independent entrepreneurs should become attentive to the role of foreign investors. Further, policy actions need to stimulate an international vision of the way of doing business among the entrepreneurial contexts of high-tech SMEs.
Originality/value
The research fills a literature gap on the role of foreign ownership in mitigating the financing limitations of independent high-tech SMEs. Additionally, as independent high-tech SMEs differ from non-independent firms, the financing constraints and information asymmetry faced by independent firms are critical and pivotal to explore.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference133 articles.
1. Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing;Management science,1990
2. Innovation strategies and economic crisis: evidence from firm-level Italian data;Economia politica,2013
3. Arrow, K. (1962), “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention”, in Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 609-626.
4. Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience;Research Policy,2006
5. From direct support of business sector R&D/innovation to targeting venture capital/private equity: a catching-up innovation and technology policy life cycle perspective;Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2008
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献