Forecasting quantitatively using micro/meso/macro‐economics with scenarios for qualitative balance

Author:

Forge Simon

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to report on a novel approach to assessing long‐term policy and technology impacts. This approach combines a qualitative forecast with a tri‐level quantitative projection to provide a broadly socio‐economic analysis. It is aimed at forecasting problems, such as impact assessment for future policy formulation in the light of socio‐economic, technological and market developments.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on a variety of research methods including scenario planning, and techniques taken from analysis of stochastic processes to identify and correlate behaviour, combined with the concepts meso‐economics, in order to produce more robust tri‐level quantitative estimations, driven by qualitative analysis.FindingsThe paper finds that it is possible to join micro‐economic behaviour to macro‐economic, using meso‐economics to attack what was previously seen as a difficult gap between the two. It also finds that quantitative forecasting, based on socio‐economic behaviour using the qualitative assessment from a scenario – i.e. from stories about the future – can form a basis for quantitative forecasting. Different scenarios may be linked to corresponding quantitative economic estimations using key indicator parameters at each economic level, those which are the most relevant to the scenarios, and so exploit statistical techniques across the three levels in a balanced fashion.Originality/valueThis paper summarises a novel approach, taking a fresh look at forecasting economic impacts assessments by shaping the quantitative form with a qualitative tool, while introducing the linking powers of meso‐economics. General economic theories in widespread use today seem to be weak when dealing with the non‐deterministic nature of real markets and economies and especially in linking micro‐economic parameters to macro‐economic. The approach attempts to resolve this dilemma. An example is presented of its use in a recent study.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference10 articles.

1. Anderla, G., Dunning, A. and Forge, S. (1997), Chaotics: an Agenda for Business and Society in the 21st Century, Praeger, New York, NY.

2. Arthur, W.B. (1994), “The end of certainty in economics”, in Aerts, D., Broekaert, J. and Mathijs, E. (Eds) (1999), Einstein Meets Magritte, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

3. Dopfer, K. (2006), “The origins of meso economics: Schumpeter's legacy”, in Evolutionary Economics Group (Ed.), Papers on Economics and Evolution, No. 0610, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena.

4. Fontela, E. (2002), “From the wealth of nations to the wealth of the world”, foresight, Vol. 4 No. 1.

5. Forge, S., Blackman, C. and Bohlin, E. (2006), “Constructing and using scenarios to forecast demand for future mobile communications services”, foresight, Vol. 8 No. 3.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3