The need for a universal humanitarian order

Author:

Veuthey Michel

Abstract

PurposeWithin the context of an international conference dealing with global challenges, the Atlantic Community and the outlook for international order organized by Webster University, Geneva (Switzerland), to propose an approach to strengthening the international order by reviving the global responsibility to abide by fundamental humanitarian rules.Design/methodology/approachThe twentieth century presented a very disturbing catalog of violations of humanitarian law. In addressing the main question of the conference, namely “What are the true principles of international order today and do we need new rules and organizing principles in the future?”, the author tackles the issue from the international humanitarian law perspective and suggests various instruments (formal and informal) for enhancing the protection of human dignity.FindingsA global responsibility to abide by fundamental humanitarian rules may be revived through positive law and judicial mechanisms, but also through a new respect for human life, a return to universal values found in all civilizations, religions and traditions, and through a new humanitarian order based on the core concept of humanity.Originality/valueThis paper suggests that it is through a combination of existing legal and humanitarian instruments, and not just one, that the international order can be strengthened.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference160 articles.

1. Abi‐Saab, G. (1984), “The specificities of humanitarian law”, in Swinarski, Ch. (Ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honor of Jean Pictet, ICRC, Geneva, pp. 265‐80.

2. Adachi, S. (1985), “Traditional Asian approaches: a Japanese view”, Australian Yearbook of International Law, No. 9, pp. 158‐67.

3. Adachi, S. (1986), “The Asian concept”, International Dimensions of Humanitarian Law, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 13‐19.

4. Anderson, K. (2000), “The Ottawa Convention banning landmines, the role of international non‐governmental organizations and the idea of international civil society”, EJIL, Vol. 11 No. 1, available at: www.ejil.org/journal/Vol11/No1/art8.html.

5. Arnaout, G.M. (1986), Asylum in the Arab‐Islamic Tradition, United Nations High Commission on Refugees, Geneva.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Humanitarian Diplomacy;The Palgrave Handbook of Diplomatic Thought and Practice in the Digital Age;2023

2. Managing military involvement in emergency preparedness in developed countries;Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management;2017-12-04

3. The regulation of non-international armed conflicts: Can a privilege of belligerency be envisioned in the law of non-international armed conflicts?;International Review of the Red Cross;2014-03

4. The Spirit of Geneva and Globalization;Refugee Survey Quarterly;2007-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3